Efficiency is addictive.
You launch a campaign. ROAS is solid. CAC is low. Margins look great.
So, naturally, you decide to keep things exactly where they are.
But here's the truth: if you're optimizing for efficiency, you're probably sacrificing growth, and not realizing how much it's costing you.
In ecommerce, what looks like smart financial control can actually be the biggest drag on your long-term revenue and brand value.
Let’s start with a disclaimer:
Yes, efficiency matters. We want smart acquisition. We want to protect margins.
But when efficiency becomes the primary metric of success, that’s when growth stalls.
Here’s what that looks like:
The intention is good. But the result? You shrink your acquisition volume. You reduce your future customer base. And you repeat the same campaign logic quarter after quarter, while competitors pass you by.
Every time you say “let’s hold here,” you’re losing out on future earnings.
Let’s look at an example from the book:
Scenario |
ROAS |
Ad Spend |
Revenue |
Contribution Margin |
Customers |
High ROAS |
8x |
$20,000 |
$160,000 |
$76,000 |
2,133 |
Growth Play |
5x |
$38,000 |
$190,000 |
$76,000 |
2,533 |
Scale Play |
3x |
$95,000 |
$285,000 |
$76,000 |
3,800 |
Every single scenario has the same profit.
But by scaling and accepting a lower ROAS, the brand in Scenario 3 acquired 1,667 more customers, which is a massive asset for future growth.
That’s the opportunity cost of staying “efficient.”
It’s understandable. Most business owners bring personal financial habits into their company:
But growth doesn’t come from savings. It comes from strategic deployment of capital.
When you treat your ad budget like a bank account instead of a growth lever, you:
And you don’t even realize it because the numbers look good.
The danger of efficiency is that it masks the cost of inaction.
Budgeting is critical. But when budgets are based on past performance and protected at all costs, they become shackles.
Here’s a typical mindset we see:
Now imagine that extra $10K could have brought in 1,000 incremental new customers at breakeven CAC.
That’s $200,000 in future LTV lost… because the spreadsheet said “stay the course.”
Most founders are worried about wasting money on underperforming campaigns.
But the bigger threat?
Not spending enough on campaigns that are working.
Every day you delay increasing spend on a profitable acquisition engine is a day you're missing out on:
You might be protecting this month’s profit, but at the cost of next quarter’s growth.
Ask yourself:
If yes, you’re optimizing for comfort, not growth.
Efficiency is easy to understand, and easy to sell to stakeholders.
But it doesn’t build momentum. It doesn’t grow LTV. And it doesn’t drive enterprise value.
What does?
So if your ROAS is high, CAC is stable, and margins are intact…
the real question isn’t: “Can we keep this up?”
It’s: “What’s the cost of not pushing further?”
We help brands move beyond “safe” spending to scalable, profitable growth by testing the limits of what your acquisition engine can really do.
👉 Partner with Human to unlock your growth ceiling
If you’ve been stuck in a budget-first, ROAS-driven mindset, the book will show you a better way to scale.
📘 Get the book → High ROAS Is Bad For Your Ecommerce Business